College Cuts to Affect Future Olympics?
Monday, August 25th, 2008The Olympics are over. Sigh. Eighteen months and counting until the 2010 Winter Games in Vancouver.
The Beijing Olympics were an overwhelming success for Team USA, who won more medals here than at any other non-boycotted Olympics. But according to an article in today’s Wall Street Journal, the elimination of many sports teams at colleges and universities across the country will threaten USA’s medal count in future Olympiads.
In the past, well-funded scholarship programs allowed colleges to recruit some of the best talent for their teams, but just as many other funding sources are being eliminated in this harsh economy, athletics departments have been forced to lose some of the very teams that have spawned Olympians in the past. Just last year, Rutgers University lost its fencing and rowing teams, along with four other sports that recruited Olympic hopefuls. In 2006, James Madison University said goodbye to ten teams, including its swim team.
For many athletes and their coaches, however, where there’s a will, there’s a way. Privately raised funds often keep programs going as club sports after they are officially cut from the school’s roster. After the men’s gymnastics team was cut from Arizona State University a few years ago, coach Scott Barclay took out a personal loan and built a personal gym for his team to continue training.
Some blame college football teams for hogging all the cash. Others say it’s due to more women competing; sports programs have had to recruit fewer men in order to be equitable with scholarships for female athletes. In any case, schools large and small have been forced to trim the fat in their athletics departments.
Is your academic future at the mercy of sports budget cuts? What are your alternatives to funding your degree if there are fewer sports scholarships available? Submit your comments and questions below.







